News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let’s avoid talk of ‘chemical imbalance’: it’s people in ... by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Thursday July 16, 2020 @11:27AM (#23859950)
As a counter point, I was on prozac (fluoxetine) for about a year after being diagnosed with major depression. Everything seemed better at first, but my personality changed in a way that, when I looked at it objectively, I did not like and eventually I felt as though the drug was merely masking depression that never actually went away.

My personal opinion having talked to doctors, therapists, and other depression sufferers is that the medical industry's treatment of depression is basically just throwing darts and hoping. They only kinda have a rough idea of how to treat some of the symptoms of depression and care not for any potential underlying causes. The "chemical imbalance" language, in my considered opinion, really does enforce this world view that depression is something you just throw drugs at until you're fixed, and I don't think that's helpful.

Re:Let’s avoid talk of ‘chemical imbalance’: it’s people in ... by Kalium on Thursday July 16, 2020 @11:56AM (#23860273)
As far as I can tell, there isn't a clear consensus on the precise causes underlying depression. It's challenging to treat causes when you lack a mechanistic understanding. So, yes, they've developed treatment protocols that use the tools they have available that sometimes work.

I don't think anybody considers this ideal, but many consider it preferable to no ability to treat at all. A world in which a deeper understanding of fundamentals enabled full treatment would be best for everyone.

It's not like nobody is trying! But setting a bone doesn't require a deep understanding of how bone knitting happens, and therefore comes well before.