News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Do journalists pay too much attention to Twitter? (2018) by Larrikin on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @09:38AM (#23831786)
4chan is a shining example of the outright failure of anonymity on the internet shines a light on the discussion. That concept just introduces people who will argue completely in bad faith, have their argument taken down eloquently by a new user not realizing what is going on, the that same troll will just post the argument again, constantly. Real names are absolutely not necessary for a good discussion but social and structural consequences are very important in removing trolls.

HNs rule if allowing throwaway accounts for discussing sensitive content is a good thing, but I'd prefer some kind of linking to the main account to make it obvious that if you're making a green account you troll it will effect your main account as well.

Re:Do journalists pay too much attention to Twitter? (2018) by syshum on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @11:00AM (#23832729)
Facebook is a shining example of the outright failure of Real Names Policy on the internet. That concept just pushes people to extremes, and excludes moderate voices that will be canceled by all sides for having an opinion that is not exactly in alignment with either extreme

Real Names polices that have been tried have also proven to do nothing to remove trolls at all, in fact the only thing that remains is shit string trolls and extremist that want to yell at each other after the shit stirring trolls rile them up

It is concerning that I am seeing more and more people push for a resurgence of "Real Names" policies on the internet as a way to curb extremism and/or trolling even after it has been proven to do nothing of the sort