News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Confidential VMs by tux3 on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @09:30AM (#23831685)
They document a "physical address based tweak". My understanding is that this is xoring a function of the physical address with each 128bit block before going into AES-ECB (and that function is that same for every VM on your system).
Re:Confidential VMs by CodesInChaos on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @10:03AM (#23832067)
The XTS/XEX modes would be a proper way to implement this. They use the same concept of xoring an address based tweak into the message.

Two subtle but important features of these modes are:

1. the tweak is xored both before and after the permutation

2. the tweak is derived from a secret and the address in a secure way

(I don't know if AMD chose such a secure mode, or used some insecure homebrew tweaking scheme)

Re:Confidential VMs by kop316 on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @09:33AM (#23831724)
I only saw that in "A Comparison Study of Intel SGX and AMD Memory Encryption", which per my grandparent comment, is not a trustworthy source (they reference the whitepaper, and the whitepaper doesn't say anything about it).

Is that documented in an actual AMD source, or even talk?

Re:Confidential VMs by tux3 on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @10:21AM (#23832276)
As far as I know, the whitepaper is all you will find publicly. It does mention the tweak (on page 4), only if you want the details and don't trust the third-party papers, you will have to reverse-engineer that yourself =]
Re:Confidential VMs by kop316 on Tuesday July 14, 2020 @04:46PM (#23837610)
Fair enough. That's what I assumed, but the HN crowd is pretty resourceful too.