Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966)
by analog31 on Sunday July 12, 2020 @06:35PM
(#23815342)
Indeed, I think it creates an odd inversion over the course of the educational process. The people who started with great work ethic and the motivation of a remunerative career, but little actual interest in the content, did great in high school but eventually gave up and switched majors.
The people with variable work ethic, but who could be motivated by the subject matter itself, mastered the subject and ended up with the remunerative careers "by accident."
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966)
by eldavido on Sunday July 12, 2020 @05:17PM
(#23814838)
A lesson I learned too late.
You have to be willing to do the work, yes, but also figure out what you really, really like doing, and then do it -- a lot. Over, and over, and over, for years or even decades.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966)
by dhruvparamhans on Thursday July 16, 2020 @06:22AM
(#23857518)
A lot of times its simply difficult to find what one really likes doing. But I agree that ones who do end up "succeeding" really follow the template you propose here.
That being said, running after high remuneration in and of itself isn't bad. Sometimes its just what you have to do because a lot of other people depend on it.
Re:Do not remain nameless to yourself (1966)
by LordHumungous on Sunday July 19, 2020 @01:25AM
(#23887214)
Sure, I guess that's one way to look at it.
You kind of missed your own (or possibly your professor's) point there: being great at something is a matter (in part) not just of putting in the work, but of having the inclination and motivation to put in so much work. If you think of it as "all the toil that gets you to that level", you're not the kind of person who is going to become great in that field.