Re:Scientists say you can cancel the noise but keep your win...
by danielheath on Sunday July 12, 2020 @12:15AM
(#23808752)
> Only for quite high frequency sounds which change very quickly.
I have young kids at home. Those are the exact sounds I’d want to cancel!
Further, that figure isn't very helpful for fluid acoustics. Within the equivalent distance you instead would get tons of nonlinear effects, because fluid flow dominates acoustic transmission. In addition to heavily changing transducer loading, things like vorticity also start to dominate. The net effect is that near field issues arise much earlier, at more like a third of a wavelength. Still, only the very lowest audible waves and quite small rooms create non-acoustic behavior.
> once you have reflections (from, say, the ground) you have to account for that as well.
Ish. Only for quite high frequency sounds which change very quickly. Otherwise reflections tend to mostly just overlap with the primary source. For low frequency waves the distance between the microphone and your ears is much smaller than the wavelength, so you don't need to worry about multiple waves very much.