Re:Linux 5.8 Formally Adds the Inclusive Terminology Guidelines
by mercer on Saturday July 11, 2020 @12:25PM
(#23803310)
Your comment basically boils down to 'how dare others request empathy'. I find that childish. How do you 'know' for a fact that their concerns are 'cheap gestures' or 'empty' or 'mockery'? And if you don't know this for sure, and accommodating is cheap, why not? Making a big deal of it strikes me as immature.
Re:Linux 5.8 Formally Adds the Inclusive Terminology Guidelines
by blub on Saturday July 11, 2020 @01:33PM
(#23803951)
I have no idea what recipe you used to boil my comment but I wrote it like I meant it, so address it like that.
For one I meant that the gestures are literally cheap: it costs almost nothing to send a tweet or invent some guidelines.
They're also empty because they don't have any effect in the real world.
Re:Linux 5.8 Formally Adds the Inclusive Terminology Guidelines
by mercer on Saturday July 11, 2020 @01:54PM
(#23804143)
How don't comments or tweets have an effect in the real world considering this 'cancel culture' hubbub and all? apparently you can get fired for tweets?
Renaming branches, streets and toppling statues are all cheap gestures that achieve nothing at all but allow those performing them to feel self-important and pose as defenders of the oppressed.
Meanwhile the oppressed would like to have at least their freedom, a roof over their head, a secure job that allows them to make a living and a modicum of respect from those around them. But no, too many people in the US (and elsewhere) can't have that because it actually requires effort, at least more than running some git command or posting a tweet.
This is such an empty and disrespectful gesture that it makes a mockery of what it means to fight against discrimination.