Re:Linux 5.8 Formally Adds the Inclusive Terminology Guidelines
by simias on Saturday July 11, 2020 @08:11AM
(#23801545)
That's my stance as well. I thought the "master/slave" thing made some sense, it was very loaded vocabulary in what should be purely technical lingo. The whitelist/blacklist thing seems a lot less meaningful to me and a bit overzealous but... meh, who cares. The churn is fairly minimal anyway and fighting it would turn it into an even bigger deal which is not what I want.
At best it'll help some people feel respected and included, at worse it'll do... nothing at all.
I'm also happy to see some somewhat level-headed discussion on these topics on HN, lately every time that stuff was brought up the thread would descend into 4chan-lite immediately. Very embarrassing. Maybe it's because we're on a weekend and people are better rested.
At best it'll help some people feel respected and included, at worse it'll do... nothing at all.
I'm also happy to see some somewhat level-headed discussion on these topics on HN, lately every time that stuff was brought up the thread would descend into 4chan-lite immediately. Very embarrassing. Maybe it's because we're on a weekend and people are better rested.