Re:Linux 5.8 Formally Adds the Inclusive Terminology Guidelines
by raspyberr on Saturday July 11, 2020 @08:04AM
(#23801479)
The reason I don't think that it's "far more descriptive" is because we had a pair of words that meant exactly what they meant. You can't get more descriptive that what they meant. And if you say the actual words have in them the description, I don't think that's relevant because most words aren't like that unless you account for etymology but you don't do you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.