Re:Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized
by nl on Saturday July 11, 2020 @04:09AM
(#23800443)
I don't have any strong opinion about if the author is a proponent of dualism. I'd note that Quantum Bayesianism[1][2] (discussed the other day on HN) seems much more mystical than this, and yet is usually considered within the realms of science.
I build neural networks in my day job. They encode tacit information because they are "based on induction rather than deduction". But that's not anything mystical - it's just learning from data, and it's not a dog whistle towards mysticism either.
[1] https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-bayesianism-explained...
[2] "For this reason, some philosophers of science have deemed QBism a form of anti-realism" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Bayesianism
I forgot to add the reference in the comment above but tacit means what I said it meant. I quoted directly from Wiktionary [1]. I'll do so again here:
I chose the "logic" interpretation as it seemed the most appropriate given the context.[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tacit