Re:Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized
by c1ccccc1 on Friday July 10, 2020 @07:03PM
(#23797621)
We have lots of evidence of how the processes of life are chemically driven: Photosynthesis captures energy from sunlight, metabolism of sugars produces ATP which is then used in a variety of ways by the cell's proteins, the DNA->RNA->Protein pipeline builds proteins from the sequences of base pairs stored in a cell's DNA, and DNA copying enzymes pass that information from generation to generation. Since you probably already know about that stuff, I guess I must be misunderstanding what kind of proof you are looking for. What sort of discovery would count as "proof" to you?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized
by jqpabc123 on Saturday July 11, 2020 @04:35AM
(#23800550)
What sort of discovery would count as "proof" to you?
The ultimate proof is actually doing it. Start with nothing but inert materials and produce a new, unique form of living organism using "just chemistry".
I'm not saying it can't be done, I am saying that thus far, it hasn't been done. And the reason it hasn't been done might be because "just chemistry" is an overly simplistic description of what is needed to actually achieve it.
But feel free to prove me wrong.