News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neural programmer better than Quicksort by ogogmad on Friday July 10, 2020 @11:25AM (#23792447)
> Depends on what kinds of mistakes the almost-correct approach makes. If it just puts elements in the wrong order, your suggestion works. But if it makes mistakes like duplicating elements, or dropping them, or completely making up new entries, no post-processing will help.

The algorithm modifies the original list only by swapping entries. As such, it's guaranteed to result in a permutation.

Re:Neural programmer better than Quicksort by eru on Saturday July 11, 2020 @01:00AM (#23799641)
Yes, in that case the post-processing would work.

But it also limits their system to in-place algorithms only.

Re:Neural programmer better than Quicksort by gryz on Sunday July 12, 2020 @07:01AM (#23810472)
Why is this limitation? Do you think the algorithm can be improved if it was doing a copy to a new location?