News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Portland approves 10% cap on fees that food delivery apps... by RussianCow on Thursday July 09, 2020 @05:58PM (#23785726)
I have actually seen quite a few restaurants do this, where they use a third-party ordering system but then delegate to DoorDash/GrubHub for delivery. Is it maybe because the delivery service gets a smaller cut in this case? I wonder if the total fees add up to a smaller number with the two middlemen than with only DoorDash/GrubHub. Presumably, the latter can charge more if they also handle the transaction as well as bring traffic, as opposed to only handling delivery.
Re:Portland approves 10% cap on fees that food delivery apps... by adfuioqenasdf on Thursday July 09, 2020 @06:10PM (#23785836)
> Is it maybe because the delivery service gets a smaller cut in this case? Yes, this is correct. If you order from DoorDash directly, the restaurant will pay anywhere from 15-40% of the total transaction.

Restaurants that have partnered with DoorDash for delivery logistics only will pay usually around $7 per order (this varies depending on geography and overall partner terms).

However, the key difference is that this delivery fee is almost always passed on to the customer. So from a restaurant's perspective, they are getting a great deal: Delivery logistics for customers who want delivery, but if they're using a low/no commission direct ordering service, they keep (most of) the full order margin.

Re:Portland approves 10% cap on fees that food delivery apps... by tgel0 on Friday July 10, 2020 @04:51AM (#23789487)
> Restaurants that have partnered with DoorDash for delivery logistics only will pay usually around $7 per order

Did you mean 7 percent of the order perhaps?