Re:Hard is not defensible (2017)
by shard on Thursday July 09, 2020 @01:08PM
(#23782396)
Bodybuilding hard seems to conflate 2 types of hard tasks: move-a-mountain-with-a-shovel hard, where something is time consuming, such as having to hand-label millions of images for machine learning datasets, and quit-heroin hard, where something is against human desires, such as convincing people to abandon their current way of doing something for something else that is a short-term loss but a long-term gain, for example switching to a more performant but incompatible CPU architecture.
Math hard, as the article says, is not really defensible, since copying is easy. Move-a-mountain hard is more defensible along the time/money axes, competitors need to throw time/money at the problem to catch up. Quit-heroin hard is the most defensible, since customers will loath to pay the switching price regularly.
Of course, it's not as black-and-white as this. All products have a mix of the three, and its where the product lands in the mix that determines the promotion strategies that the company should take.
Math hard, as the article says, is not really defensible, since copying is easy. Move-a-mountain hard is more defensible along the time/money axes, competitors need to throw time/money at the problem to catch up. Quit-heroin hard is the most defensible, since customers will loath to pay the switching price regularly.
Of course, it's not as black-and-white as this. All products have a mix of the three, and its where the product lands in the mix that determines the promotion strategies that the company should take.