MIT and Harvard file suit against new ICE regulations

Re:MIT and Harvard file suit against new ICE regulations by cauthon on Wednesday July 08, 2020 @01:25PM (#23772021)

This is reductionist. The academic jobs OminousWeapons is talking about are not likely to be filled by domestic workers because they're severely underpaid.

NIH annual stipends are ~$25k for graduate students and $52-65k for postdocs [1]. There is a massive opportunity cost associated with these positions, _particularly_ for people coming from less affluent backgrounds. It's really hard to accept a 50-70% pay cut (assuming you could otherwise take a tech role) if you have an unprecedented opportunity to contribute to your and your family's financial stability.

[1] https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-20-0...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT and Harvard file suit against new ICE regulations by twymacademic on Thursday July 09, 2020 @01:47AM (#23777285)

Markets work. Cutting off the vast supply of minimum wage international workers will incentivize Universities to treat and pay their junior researchers better.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MIT and Harvard file suit against new ICE regulations by OminousWeapons on Thursday July 09, 2020 @09:16AM (#23779810)

As the parent insinuated, stipends are set by the NIH and congress, not the university. They are largely paid out with grant funding from the government. If an entity wanted to pay a researcher more, it can't come from federal funds which is how most labs (outside of big ones that have industry collaboration) primarily fund themselves. So while markets work, this isn't a competitive market, it is a regulated one where a ceiling is being set.

https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/salary-cap-stipen...

[ Parent | on HN ]