> A lot of business software is boring. It does not take skill to do.

I guess it depends on your definition of "skill". ERP systems are complex, full of problems, inflexible and managed by bean-counters with "battle-axe" personalities. If you look at the work holistically, it does take skill and experience. There is a lot of room for improvement in these systems but the problems involve people as much as they involve technology.

>So my advice to non-FAANG developers: if you want to make development your career, learn to be bored.

is life at FANG really that different tho? Can't imagine that everyone is working on exciting stuff all the time. Would appreciate if someone could enlighten me.

I can speak for only one of the FAANGs, but the work I do there is definitely the most exciting to me personally from all the companies I've been at. There are challenging technical problems that require discussion with other engineers to design a solution. In most companies I've been before the challenges were mostly organizational and I had to deal with all of the "agile" crap to please PMs and managers, while the actual technical work was boringly easy.

It's not always rainbows and butterflies here either but I do feel much happier with the work I do here.

Well somebody has to be the one to annotate a million private and public SDK’s with @nullable !!

And once you’re done with that, there’s a whole load more refactoring for the latest language update!

The only difference at (most of) Google is that you would use grpc instead of ftp and protobuf instead of txt.