News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:As a VC, how is a $41 million investment in Color justified? by il on Sunday March 27, 2011 @09:03PM (#2376639)
This seems reasonable, except that the #1 rule of investing is that past performance does not guarantee future results.

If the team is so great and VCs are investing in the team, then why is the UI/usability of Color so bad?

I think the reason startup people are so down on Color is that they believe that $41M distributed among many different startups would be better for the tech ecosystem/community as a whole, resulting in more innovation and progress than a single photo sharing app.

Re:As a VC, how is a $41 million investment in Color justified? by alphaoverlord on Sunday March 27, 2011 @10:04PM (#2376803)
> $41M distributed among many different startups would be better for the tech ecosystem/community as a whole

In what ways? How would that be true? It's a free market - you get what you can get. You can argue fb doesn't deserve its valuation either, but there doesn't seem to be same amount of disbelief and schadenfreude-seeking.

Re:As a VC, how is a $41 million investment in Color justified? by pclark on Sunday March 27, 2011 @09:33PM (#2376709)
I am not sure your opinion on the #1 rule of investing applies to Venture Capital considering the primary focus is on the team. Mind you, perhaps this is a reason as to why Venture Capital on the whole has been less than stellar at times.

I believe what happened to Color is that they got tunnel vision on their ideal environment for their product, ad optimised around that - rather than the initial user experience. Specifically, I mean they were using Color around dozens of other users, whereas most new users today use it in their bedroom miles from a second user - so a lot of the UI elements are confusing when no additional data is avaliable. People do make mistakes.

Re:As a VC, how is a $41 million investment in Color justified? by rudiger on Sunday March 27, 2011 @09:58PM (#2376776)
I highly doubt that real "startup people" are that socialist (ie. we should distribute Seqouia et al.'s $41M among many 2-3 person startups vs. a single team of ~30 people).