Re:A terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day at Slack
by iampims on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @10:47AM
(#23759806)
If I had To guess, I’d say that Slack’s infrastructure footprint is probably as big if not bigger than any popular PaaS.
Re:A terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day at Slack
by waprin on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @12:53PM
(#23761129)
Snapchat runs on App Engine (and other stuff runs on App Engine too) so App Engine is almost certainly bigger than Slack just based on that.
Re:A terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day at Slack
by codonaut on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @11:19AM
(#23760136)
That seems... Questionable.
Re:A terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day at Slack
by johannes1234321 on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @11:52AM
(#23760457)
Question on how they measure - I'm in 7 slack workspaces. Do I count 7 times?
Re:A terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day at Slack
by clemParis on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @12:04PM
(#23760588)
Well, I have to create a new account every time I join a new group, so I'd say yes.
Re:A terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad day at Slack
by johannes1234321 on Tuesday July 07, 2020 @12:33PM
(#23760879)
Two if my workspaces are tied to the same enterprise account, they should be the same, but who knows how they measure. My base assumption is "in a way giving nicer numbers"
The idea of requests going to an application server on a TCP or HTTP connection with the application server being able to access a database or datastore is now common enough for all the PaaS providers to have abstractions for it, with the load balancing and database/data stores being managed. If customers aren’t happy with the auto scaling logic that can be overridden, but it seems like everything else is pretty rock solid.
Slack’s USP isn’t to reinvent load balancing, distributed configuration or database management, so if I was running it and had a clean slate a PaaS seems like a better bet.