You missed my point. The problem with a definition for God is that it would take God to check that proof. That's where dfranke said it "approaches tautology" and I agree. We just can't ever be sure that what we come up with is correct or circular. That's faith and humility rolled into one. And it's where I most disagree with Dawkins. His definition doesn't speak for me, and his training gives him no special insight into the problem.