Re:Florida becomes first state to enact DNA privacy law, blo...
by nradov on Monday July 06, 2020 @02:43AM
(#23745315)
There's a huge difference between shifting the payment risk from private insurers to the government, and real socialized medicine. Under most socialized medicine schemes the majority of healthcare providers become government employees.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Florida becomes first state to enact DNA privacy law, blo...
by dukeyukey on Monday July 06, 2020 @03:16AM
(#23745475)
Many, but certainly not all. I imagine most people don't really care who the end-employer of medical staff are if they get guaranteed a certain baseline level of care that isn't "go to A&E and pray they fix you up".
Re:Florida becomes first state to enact DNA privacy law, blo...
by zajio1am on Monday July 06, 2020 @11:12AM
(#23748761)
That is just question of definition of 'socialized medicine' term. Many universal healthcare systems in Europe are based on public/government insurance, and mixed private and public healthcare providers.
Re:Florida becomes first state to enact DNA privacy law, blo...
by WrtCdEvrydy on Monday July 06, 2020 @03:18AM
(#23745488)
Medicare does it differently.
You qualify for it and then pick a company to administer benefits. Some companies have great benefits for elders, some have great benefits for young people and families with children.
Re:Florida becomes first state to enact DNA privacy law, blo...
by arcticbull on Monday July 06, 2020 @10:41AM
(#23748394)
Socialized medicine does not require single payer, for instance look at how Australia manages their system. Single payer is the exception, not the rule.