News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China suppression of Uighurs meets U.N. definition of gen... by cercatrova on Sunday July 05, 2020 @01:06PM (#23740156)
The fallacy is assuming the nature of civilizations has changed or will continue to get better over time. Human nature is fundamentally warlike, with the subjugation of those tribes deemed lesser, or just in the way of some natural resource. While there is cooperation within individuals in the tribe, history has shown that tribes will conquer rather than cooperate with other tribes given the chance.

This is just the present manifestation of human nature. I assume, just as genocides and war has occurred in the past, they will continue to occur in the present and future, and we will never achieve world peace until human nature itself is changed, perhaps through some future genetic engineering that would make everyone exceedingly docile.

Re:China suppression of Uighurs meets U.N. definition of gen... by pasquinelli on Sunday July 05, 2020 @01:51PM (#23740476)
you're attributing to individuals traits that belong to groups. americans are docile, but america is very violent and easily provoked. so why do you think genetically engineering people to be more docile would help?

what could be more docile than an ant? but an ant nest is a psycho. i think you might have the whole thing flipped on its head, at least. mass violence requires mass discipline, and you can only discipline a subject that's docile.