Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by harikb on Saturday July 04, 2020 @12:50PM
(#23733442)
With a text like this, you can’t blame the readers assuming incompatibility and losing interest
> Now, what does Gemini currently have to offer? The best way to find out is to head over to the official site: gemini.circumlunar.space in your Gemini browser.
Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by pkphilip on Sunday July 05, 2020 @08:05AM
(#23738063)
The Gemini protocol throws away a huge number of advances - in effect throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Gemini protocol could have been a subset of HTTP and the document format could have been a subset of HTML. For instance, if you decide to not implement cookies, javascript etc but if you retain the ability to have formatting for texts, tables, images etc it would have been sufficient.
And even in the case of images, the protocol could have mandated that images cannot be accessed cross-site. The same restrictions could have been placed on other aspects such as the style sheets.
Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by jhardy54 on Saturday July 04, 2020 @12:42PM
(#23733392)
Gemeni is a subset of HTTP?! I thought it was similar to HTTP, like Gopher. Could you link to the relevant docs?
They did. That's the Gemini protocol. I recommend reading the spec to properly understand the constraints they were trying to meet.