Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by petra on Saturday July 04, 2020 @01:05PM
(#23733529)
Missing 99% of your potential readers is a big problem, though.
Maybe there's another way?
For example, Gemini could only link through a centralized link management server, and that link server will verify links to be "clean" , and if a link isn't clean it will become dead ?
Of course, that depends whether said link gets most of his traffic from within Gemini or outside.
Hmm...
Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by vertex-four on Saturday July 04, 2020 @01:27PM
(#23733649)
I spend most of my time in small spaces - 100 people, max, of who about 10 might be around at any given time. I'm not worried that people are going to miss what I have to say, because I'm talking to the people who are there. The people who aren't might as well be irrelevant.
Have you ever spent any time in small communities? It's lovely to just... not have to care about gaining followers or making arbitrary counters go up or whatever it is people do, and just talk/create for the sake of it. There's no "brand" to care about.
Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by majewsky on Saturday July 04, 2020 @09:17PM
(#23736012)
Counterpoint: All these brain structures that make us crave power and influence evolved in a time in which humans exclusively dealt with small communities (going by your "100 people max" criterion).
Re:A look at the Gemini protocol: a brutally simple alternat...
by vertex-four on Sunday July 05, 2020 @05:53AM
(#23737625)
The usual process of gaining influence in small communities looks a lot healthier a behaviour than the process of gaining it in large ones, IMO.
The entire purpose here is to build a community of people who care about this sort of thing, who write content for that community, where taking your content away from that community is not an easy decision of adding a <script> or <style> tag.