News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by asciimo on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:35PM (#23716471)
So if you ask people if they’d be happier living in California or the Midwest, most people say California. Actually the regions have comparable life satisfaction, but people say California because they think of the weather and fail to take account of other things, such as the fact that California is full of tedious hippies.

The author does not cite research about about how "tedious hippies" make people sad, nor demographic evidence that California is "full of" them.

Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by throw975 on Thursday July 02, 2020 @05:08PM (#23718096)
Yeah, I'm not sure what the author[0] means there either. I looked through the latest Census and I couldn't find any sufficient data on "hippies", as there was not a question for that[1]. If there is no data on it, how can one make the dubious claim that one is "full of"[2] them? I really wish this article was more well researched[3].

[0] by author I am referring to the author of the article which this thread is talking about

[1] https://data.census.gov/cedsci/

[2] by "full of" I assume a simple majority

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research

Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by xxmarkuski on Friday July 03, 2020 @01:27AM (#23721276)
The part about hippies is just an example, think of it as an figure of speech. The point he is making has nothing to do with the weather or hippies, it's that peoples believes on what makes them happy are not in alignment to what actually makes them happy or they fail to take account for lots of variables changing, while they believe only one changes.
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by tome on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:40PM (#23716529)
I think it might be a joke.
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by hugodutka on Thursday July 02, 2020 @06:29PM (#23718861)
At first I thought that parent didn't understand the joke. Now I think I might have not understood the meta-joke.
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by edeion on Saturday July 04, 2020 @11:55AM (#23733113)
Yes, I think the parent is a /metajoke/ as you call it :) However, there are 3 threads around that miss the original author is poking fun there. I'd like to stress the structure of these 3 paragraphs:

  The first is that, [serious things with a reference] they think of the weather and fail to take account of other things, such as the fact that California is full of tedious hippies.
  The second, [serious things with a reference] [after a breakup] we’ll decide we never liked the person anyway.
  The third [serious things with a reference]. In other words, last night’s party was never as good as you think it was.
Given my HN karma, I won't dare end this comment with an attempt at being humorous. It would be akin to a HN suicide.
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by indigochill on Thursday July 02, 2020 @04:05PM (#23717412)
I've lived in both places. I'd be open to going back to lots of places in the Midwest. I'd only move back to the Sierra Nevada foothills in California (where there are still tedious hippies, but they're more my kind of tedious hippies).
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by new2628 on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:50PM (#23716616)
There are some widely agreed upon truths that need no citation :)
Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by throw975 on Thursday July 02, 2020 @05:09PM (#23718104)
Can you point me towards those? I think you are referring to aphorisms[0], but I couldn't find any in the related Wikipedia article[1].

[0] a pithy observation that contains a general truth

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphorism

Re:A researcher on how to live a happy life by stopnamingnuts on Thursday July 02, 2020 @03:22PM (#23716961)
Can confirm.