News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Markets, Rent and WFH by davidw on Thursday July 02, 2020 @01:52PM (#23715997)
Japan has very much not treated homes as an investment vehicle though.

https://www.vox.com/2016/8/8/12390048/san-francisco-housing-...

I do have some recollection of commercial real estate being bonkers there for a while, so maybe they've managed to treat one as an investment and the other as something necessary for people to live in.

Re:Markets, Rent and WFH by credit_guy on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:41PM (#23716535)
Japan has not treated homes as investments lately.

This was not always the case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_asset_price_bubble#As...

In the '80s until about '91 there was a huge real estate bubble in Japan; house prices tripled or quadrupled over less than one decade. Could it be a coincidence that the short-term rate set by Bank of Japan went from a 9% in 1981 to 2.5% in 1991?

Your link shows that real estate prices remained nearly flat in Tokyo since 1995, but at that point Japan was already in the trap of zero rates and sky-high house prices. Prices simply couldn't go any higher. People were already taking 100-year mortgages in Japan in 1995 [1]. Salaries were not going up. Nikkei was going sometime up, more often down; and kept doing that for 2 decades.

On a comparative basis, real estate in NYC and London were much cheaper in 1995. But they steadily went up, and up, and up. Now they exceed Tokyo. Rates are about zero too. We are where Japan was in 1995. Except for the 100-year mortgages. Don't be surprised if they'll make an appearance though.

[1] https://homeguides.sfgate.com/longest-mortgage-7677.html

Re:Markets, Rent and WFH by davidw on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:52PM (#23716644)
The post I was responding to said that cheap money would drive people into real estate. That's clearly not the case in Japan. Cheap money has coincided with flat home prices.

They could go higher, but they aren't.

I've read that there's also a cultural component, that people treat housing more like a consumption good ... a car, say, something that they value less the older it gets.

Re:Markets, Rent and WFH by SenHeng on Thursday July 02, 2020 @07:22PM (#23719210)
Part of it was regulation where properties will lose value over time, and after 30 years it is considered worthless. The value of the land may have gone up in price if you live somewhere desirable like Tokyo but the building that sits on it is considered worthless, possibly of negative value even as it costs around 1 million yen (10kUSD) to knock it down.

This was intended to promote new construction of housing, the unintended consequences is that homes are thus not built to last and home maintenance is rarely performed.

Though in recent years, there has a been a slight boom of people purchasing second homes to renovate rather than build new.

> Doomed from the moment construction begins, the average Japanese home depreciates from Day 1 — losing half its value in 10 years and becoming almost entirely worthless in 25. This depreciation comes hand in hand with the infamous mantra that a Japanese home is limited to a lifespan of 30 years and causes somewhat of a chicken-and-egg conundrum.

[0]: https://www.rethinktokyo.com/2018/06/06/depreciate-limited-l...

[1]: https://www.rethinktokyo.com/faq-secondhand-homes-renovation...