Re:DuckDuckGo browser seemingly sends domains a user visits ...
by dabbernaught420 on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @11:45PM
(#23709776)
I'm talking about situations where no fallacy has actually occurred, not situations where a fallacy has occurred but a correct conclusion has been arrived at anyway.
Re:DuckDuckGo browser seemingly sends domains a user visits ...
by kd5bjo on Thursday July 02, 2020 @04:02AM
(#23710985)
That’d be a form of equivocation: the accuser is using an incorrect definition of the fallacy, instead of the true one.
Re:DuckDuckGo browser seemingly sends domains a user visits ...
by travisjungroth on Thursday July 02, 2020 @11:08AM
(#23714039)
I see what you mean. Just because you’re saying a person has a bad history doesn’t mean your committing an “ad hominem”. That seems different.
Re:DuckDuckGo browser seemingly sends domains a user visits ...
by the_cramer on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:22AM
(#23710534)
So what does any fallacy tell me then? Especially the fallacy fallacy? If it does invalidate the invalidation of fallacies it is in itself untrue...bz...recursion error..bz stack overflow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy