News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Space Jam's 1996 website is still alive by godzillabrennus on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @11:33PM (#23709698)
Aleksandar Totic from the original mosaic team has his website still up.

http://totic.org/nscp/index.html

Personally I enjoyed this bit:

http://totic.org/nscp/swirl/swirl.html

If Aleksandar reads hacker news I hope he never takes that down.

Re:Space Jam's 1996 website is still alive by fearingreprisal on Thursday July 02, 2020 @12:25AM (#23710010)
"So far, I haven't received any swirl pictures from the outside world. I find this hard to believe that we are the only ones enjoying this activity."

Hard to believe, isn't it...

Re:Space Jam's 1996 website is still alive by rconti on Thursday July 02, 2020 @01:24AM (#23710274)
We called them "swirlies" in middle school/high school. But I've never actually seen someone get one, and it could well be mostly apocryphal. And it wasn't something you sought out, it was like, you were getting bullied.
Re:Space Jam's 1996 website is still alive by chrisco255 on Thursday July 02, 2020 @02:43AM (#23710614)
I liked this quote from the page: "Tim Berners-Lee on home page: Q. The idea of the "home page" evolved in a different direction.

A. Yes. With all respect, the personal home page is not a private expression; it's a public billboard that people work on to say what they're interested in. That's not as interesting to me as people using it in their private lives. It's exhibitionism, if you like. Or self-expression. It's openness, and it's great in a way, it's people letting the community into their homes. But it's not really their home. They may call it a home page, but it's more like the gnome in somebody's front yard than the home itself. People don't have the tools for using the Web for their homes, or for organizing their private lives; they don't really put their scrapbooks on the Web. They don't have family Webs. There are many distributed families nowadays, especially in the high-tech fields, so it would be quite reasonable to do that, yet I don't know of any. One reason is that most people don't have the ability to publish with restricted access."

Basically was describing the concept of social networks before they existed on the web.

Re:Space Jam's 1996 website is still alive by infinity0 on Thursday July 02, 2020 @12:35PM (#23715060)
Except it's not really private; some random big company sees everything you do inside your house.

Oh wait TVs do that now. I guess the real world evolved to be more like social networks...

Re:Space Jam's 1996 website is still alive by rconti on Thursday July 02, 2020 @01:25AM (#23710283)
The Oasis closed a couple of years back :(