News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Lightning by jojobas on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @09:34PM (#23709029)
How would you maintain such a margin on the cables if they could be "dumb"?
Re:Apple Lightning by neotek on Thursday July 02, 2020 @01:52AM (#23710403)
The last time I looked, the money Apple earned from the entirety of the MFi program — not just cables, but every single third-party Apple accessory on Earth — made up less than one half of one percent of their annual revenue. It's such a vanishingly small part of their business.

It's far more likely that the purpose of MFi is to make sure that any officially licensed accessories aren't pieces of shit that Apple will cop the blame for. Most users aren't going to blame the cable manufacturer when their phone won't charge properly, since the vast majority of people have no idea about the complexities of modern charging protocols, so they're going to mistakenly think the phone is at fault and blame Apple.

Re:Apple Lightning by williamdclt on Thursday July 02, 2020 @05:20AM (#23711421)
> every single third-party Apple accessory on Earth made up less than one half of one percent of their annual revenue

That makes me even more angry about the ridiculous price of these accessories

Re:Apple Lightning by rconti on Thursday July 02, 2020 @01:34AM (#23710325)
Considering they're already being ripped off anyway, and most consumers don't know they're "smart", the margins would be higher selling a "dumb" cable that costs less to make, at the same price as they sell them at today.