Re:Missing Structure in Technical Discussions
by amadeuspagel on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @01:11AM
(#23697960)
Arguman's fallacy system is really an anti-feature. It's impossible to separate the claim that a specific argument is a fallacy from a counter-argument. Many people seem to think that you can just take a word describing a kind of a argument, attach "fallacy" to it, and you have refuted it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Missing Structure in Technical Discussions
by serkandurusoy on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @06:14AM
(#23699859)
Ah, I guess I was wrong earlier when saying that this was not a problem with the tool.
Merely allowing fallacies seemingly has an adverse affect on the whole promise.
Thanks for this clarification.
Re:Missing Structure in Technical Discussions
by DEADBEEFC0FFEE on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @03:35AM
(#23698843)
Classic Fallacy Recursion Fallacy . You lose ! :)