Re:Yann LeCun quits Twitter amid acrimonious exchanges on AI...
by joshuamorton on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @11:44PM
(#23697543)
> The negligence here is on the part of everyone getting their hackles raised over nothing.
To be clear no one (or at least no one of note) has their hackles raised over this specific dataset. PULSE is fine for what it is, and no one criticized PULSE for having these results.
It is however a great demonstration for laypeople about how ML models aren't magic and don't always do what you, as a human, would expect. This is true irrespective of the source of that unexpected behavior.
That said, I believe the disclaimer you mention was added only after the recent twitter discussion.
To be clear no one (or at least no one of note) has their hackles raised over this specific dataset. PULSE is fine for what it is, and no one criticized PULSE for having these results.
It is however a great demonstration for laypeople about how ML models aren't magic and don't always do what you, as a human, would expect. This is true irrespective of the source of that unexpected behavior.
That said, I believe the disclaimer you mention was added only after the recent twitter discussion.