News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99 by roywiggins on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @10:46PM (#23697219)
They're maybe trying to use the same law that Locast[1] is: there's a specific carve-out in the law about rebroadcasting for nonprofits: "an exception in U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C. § 111) for retransmission of television programming by non-profits without charge or any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage (besides the costs needed to cover the operations and maintenance of the retransmitter), which was originally intended to cover over-the-air translator stations" [2]

[1] https://www.locast.org

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locast#Legal_challenge

Re:YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99 by londons_explore on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @09:30AM (#23701083)
> direct or indirect commercial advantage

So none of the research results will be licensed, patented, or used to bolster the universities reputation?

Re:YouTube TV sharply increases monthly subscription to $64.99 by salawat on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @10:09AM (#23701466)
That's not commercial advantage as colloquially known. Commercial advantage would roughly translate to direct profit taking.

And they aren't doing it to become world renowned for their rebroadcasting, they're doing research and publishing results first and foremost. Big difference. Unless you want to start couching every type of university research as commercial advantage now, which seems pretty harmful to the university research landscape to me.