News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Yann LeCun quits Twitter amid acrimonious exchanges on AI... by lowbloodsugar on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @10:11PM (#23696984)
Guns don't kill people, its the people who keep loading them with bullets and shooting them at people.

ML isn't biased, its the people who keep loading them with biased data, and then running them against photos of people.

Re:Yann LeCun quits Twitter amid acrimonious exchanges on AI... by laretluval on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @10:16PM (#23697008)
This was the kind of reasoning that led gun makers to develop safety mechanisms.

It isn't clear what a similar safety mechanism would look like for an ML algorithm. Modern ML algorithms are nothing more than generic pattern extractors. What would a safety mechanism look like?

Re:Yann LeCun quits Twitter amid acrimonious exchanges on AI... by karpierz on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @10:54PM (#23697271)
And led to government regulation of distributing guns.

Have government grants for ML research be contingent on training on diverse datasets. Fund research into more diverse benchmarks and push them as the goal to beat.

Re:Yann LeCun quits Twitter amid acrimonious exchanges on AI... by int_19h on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @10:23PM (#23697060)
It is unethical (and, in many places, a crime) to sell a firearm to somebody whom you know, or reasonably suspect, intends to use it for criminal purposes.
Re:Yann LeCun quits Twitter amid acrimonious exchanges on AI... by mempko on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @10:26PM (#23697085)
Yes, but certainly guns are designed to kill people. Just like an AI.system might be designed to catch "criminals"