News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linear – A fast issue tracker by SAI_Peregrinus on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @04:52PM (#23694640)
I haven't tried Linear, but my company uses Jira. It's abysmally slow. Not "there are too many tickets and it's hard to manage" slow, just the interface is slow. I opened an issue link in a new tab. It took about 7 seconds for the page to become interactive (able to click on the issue status and get a dropdown) and about 9 seconds for the loading to complete and elements to stop jumping around. This is in Firefox 78 on a Lenovo T480 with 8th-gen Core i7 CPU. Speed.cloudflare.com reports 28.5ms latency with 38.1ms jitter, 339Mbps down. Not a generally slow setup. At least in the case of Jira the interface speed is a huge issue.
Re:Linear – A fast issue tracker by flarg on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @04:56PM (#23694678)
This. Jira used to be famous for it's ease of use and fantastic cross linking between artifacts, but now it's always just very slow.
Re:Linear – A fast issue tracker by zerkten on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @05:08PM (#23694801)
Is there a site that lets you run performance profiles in browser developer tools and share the results? I could imagine that being really useful internally for devs troubleshooting and working with support.

It'd be harder to pull off as a way to shame poor performance because of the need to compare like with like, but I think it's needed to get the attention of folks.

Accessibility checkers are often rudimentary, but they are available to non-technical folks in companies and can be very effective at getting a conversation started.

Re:Linear – A fast issue tracker by SAI_Peregrinus on Wednesday July 01, 2020 @08:39AM (#23700677)
No clue. I'm an embedded dev, so my method for getting the numbers above was the stopwatch part of my phone's clock app. Thus the "about" qualifiers.

But it's slow enough to use a damn stopwatch app manually. That technique shouldn't even enter the discussion!