News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube bans Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, Richard Spencer... by pingpongchef on Monday June 29, 2020 @04:38PM (#23682635)
If white supremacists can believe contradictory ideas and still be white supremacists, then how are we to determine who is and isn't? By this logic there's no evidence you could give me to prove you're not a white supremacist since contradictions. I don't mean that as a personal attack, but I hope you see how untenable such a line of thinking is.

Also, I do understand the possibility that someone could claim to believe one thing and not actually believe it. It simply requires a higher burden of proof.

Re:YouTube bans Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, Richard Spencer... by opnitro on Monday June 29, 2020 @04:41PM (#23682700)
If you're asking how people can hold contradictory ideas... then I'd invite you do some self reflection. You probably hold some. We all do. Striving towards clarity of thought takes a while.

As for white supremacists in specific, let's take David Duke and Richard Spencer for example. (As you agreed above they were white supremacists) Both of these people claim to believe in science and reason, yet also believe in the superiority of the white race.

[dead]
Re:YouTube bans Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, Richard Spencer... by snowwrestler on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:53PM (#23683654)
If you (or any reader) are interested in substantive critiques of this book, here are two:

https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/Her...

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/5/18/15655638/charles-...

Re:YouTube bans Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, Richard Spencer... by AgentME on Monday June 29, 2020 @08:03PM (#23684986)
Here's an unusually good video critiquing it too: https://youtu.be/UBc7qBS1Ujo
Re:YouTube bans Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, Richard Spencer... by opnitro on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:43PM (#23683541)
A book riddled with methodological errors, and not even peer reviewed, does not a good post make