Re:Putin's People – a groundbreaking study that follows the ...
by dreen on Monday June 29, 2020 @06:23AM
(#23676153)
They are absolutely aggressors, and the defensive posturing is something they (Russian leaders) have used for centuries to excuse aggression. Their armies never conquer, they "liberate". This is not a tactic unique to them, but one they excel in.
Re:Putin's People – a groundbreaking study that follows the ...
by toyg on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:32AM
(#23675885)
> They did a terrible job from the rise of the proletariat
They did a terrible job even before that, with "The Great Game" and all that. In fact, it was so bad even their own people had had enough.
Re:Putin's People – a groundbreaking study that follows the ...
by redis_mlc on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:17AM
(#23675826)
No, Russian doctrine is to occupy neighboring countries to fight outside their own borders.
Just because they're afraid of having their "backs-to-the-wall" doesn't mean their doctrine is legitimate.
Re:Putin's People – a groundbreaking study that follows the ...
by redis_mlc on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:58PM
(#23683709)
Description of how Russian military doctrine resulted in the annexation of the Baltic states in WW2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Baltic_state...
However to call them aggressors is a total perversion of the word aggression. Their posture is backs-to-the-wall defensive in relation to Western powers.