Sometimes I get forced to use a chromium based browser for specific sites. In those cases I use edge for Windows because it's built-in and can't be removed anyway.
If I was just commenting that I would prefer to use chromium for privacy reasons but it's not worthy of installing separately for the few chromium specific sites I need to visit.
I don't see how having a preference over this is downvote worthy. Isn't that the entire purpose of these kinds of threads?
Thumper is a simple game but it requires you to basically turn left, turn right, or shields up very quickly. It is basically a reaction time test so very susceptible to latency.
I had earlier played assassin's creed in the private beta thing on an older laptop on Verizon FiOS. I did reach for the Ethernet cable most of the time but iirc it was serviceable even on WiFi because assassin's creed is less affected by the occasional latency spike. That or maybe Verizon FiOS where I was before in the city area has fewer connection problems than Comcast further out of a town.
I do worry about how fast it would eat up bandwidth though...
Anyway that's why I'm here.
I have plenty of space on my SSD. Lots of free ram. I uninstalled and reinstalled.
Seems ridiculous that every program has to include its own update manager—on MacOS too but it at least has brew-cask.
However, on my machines I just main firefox with edge as a backup. Mainly because edge is already pre-installed on my Windows machines so there isn't really much point downloading and installing an alternative which does the exact same thing. Especially if it's only for use on chromium specific websites.
It's not like you can remove edge from Windows 10. Why would I install Vivaldi, Google Chrome or Brave?