Re:Astronomers detect regular rhythm of radio waves, with or...
by cheerlessbog on Sunday June 28, 2020 @08:51AM
(#23668390)
A broader question that puzzles me, not specific to this phenomenon. Pulse length is often used to bound the size of a source in space (it cannot be smaller than light takes to traverse the object). But it’s possible that two phenomena can be correlated without being close, if there is a delayed action (akin to setting two alarm clocks and separating them in space). How can we confidently use this as evidence of size?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Astronomers detect regular rhythm of radio waves, with or...
by throwaway4220 on Monday June 29, 2020 @05:26PM
(#23683308)
> Pulse length is often used to bound the size of a source in space (it cannot be smaller than light takes to traverse the object).
Sorry for the possibly noob question, but why is this? I can't think of an intuitive explanation
Re:Astronomers detect regular rhythm of radio waves, with or...
by cheerlessbog on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @01:04AM
(#23686732)
I guess the assumption is that the phenomenon starts at a point, spreads across the object sized l at c, and lasts for only a period of time t at any location. Therefore the pulse ends after l/c + t = T. By measuring T you can put an upper bound on l.
Example of this inference, from the Wikipedia on Fast Radio Bursts (but I have seen in many contexts):
> The sources are thought to be a few hundred kilometers or less in size, as the bursts last for only a few milliseconds
Does that make sense?
Re:Astronomers detect regular rhythm of radio waves, with or...
by cheerlessbog on Tuesday June 30, 2020 @01:12AM
(#23686778)
I just realized what I described is not giving a lower bound.