News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Santa Cruz, California bans predictive policing in U.S. f... by indigochill on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:21PM (#23654453)
I'm curious what your source is for that, because that's pretty remarkable, especially given the outcry about out-of-control military spending.
Re:Santa Cruz, California bans predictive policing in U.S. f... by benjaminmarks on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:26PM (#23654509)
Arbitrarily citing https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-budget/policy-basics-w...

The bulk of social services spending is social security and medicare, which _each_ account for somewhere between 20-30% of federal spending. Military spending is closer to 15-20% of the federal budget

Re:Santa Cruz, California bans predictive policing in U.S. f... by brchr on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:28PM (#23654530)
There are some semantic issues, e.g., the distinction between "mandatory" and "discretionary" expenditures, but the data is pretty easy to explore.

Essentially you are "both right". > 50% of total spending is Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Whether that is "social services" is another semantic question.

And > 50% of the discretionary budget is defense.

But have a look for yourself: e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget

Re:Santa Cruz, California bans predictive policing in U.S. f... by throwaway894345 on Friday June 26, 2020 @02:15PM (#23655142)
> Whether that is "social services" is another semantic question.

This is puzzling to me. I don't think I've ever heard anyone argue that social security, medicare, and medicaid aren't social services. As far as I'm aware, everyone agrees that these are all social services. I would be curious to hear arguments for excluding it from the "social services" rubric.