News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Color.com Was Acquired For $350,000 (The Domain Name, Tha... by khafra on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:01PM (#2365173)
Upvoted for hard data. Strange, though, that out of the most valuable 10 domain names, I don't recognize any as being at the top of their industry. I wonder if they got their money's worth.

At least it's a fungible asset unlikely to depreciate. You'd have to do extraordinarily awful as a business to significantly lower the value of your domain name.

Re:Color.com Was Acquired For $350,000 (The Domain Name, Tha... by Tycho on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:25PM (#2365257)
I have doubts about their long-term value. People enter actual urls less and less, eventually I can see the browsers ditching them completely (from the presentation layer), and then you might struggle to find anyone paying millions for .coms. Likewise the marketability of a 'dotcom' brand might fade like tech terms often do (remember when everyone used to boast about having 'CD-ROMs').
Re:Color.com Was Acquired For $350,000 (The Domain Name, Tha... by MichaelApproved on Thursday March 24, 2011 @07:20PM (#2366439)
I thought a lot of the value came from SEO. I just googled "sex" and sex.com didn't come up at all. That could be because they have a link page up instead of any content. Googling "slots" at least brought up slots.com 6th.
Re:Color.com Was Acquired For $350,000 (The Domain Name, Tha... by benvanderbeek on Thursday March 24, 2011 @03:28PM (#2365516)
In terms of being top of their industry, I would think that spending this kind of money on a domain would be accompanied by the conscious or subconscious thought that since we have such an amazing domain, we'll coast and let the traffic/money come in, vs. obscure domains/company names who have to earn traffic by proving their value.