News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by barbegal on Friday June 26, 2020 @03:57AM (#23649750)
Because most Europeans use weighing scales rather than volumetric measurements. When I'm baking I put the bowl on the scales and pour in the ingredients. When recipes say 1tbsp or 2tsp it gets me annoyed because if they had converted to grams I could just pour those ingredients straight in too but instead I need to get out my volumetric measures (or in most cases just guess and hope it doesn't matter too much)
Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by gruez on Friday June 26, 2020 @09:09AM (#23651546)
>When recipes say 1tbsp or 2tsp it gets me annoyed because if they had converted to grams I could just pour those ingredients straight in too but instead I need to get out my volumetric measures

Are kitchen scales accurate enough for such tiny measurements? 1 teaspoon is 5ml, so if your scale only has 1g of precision you're looking at up to a 10℅ variance (assuming you're measuring water), and that's assuming its accurate at that range. It gets worse when you need to deal with fractional teaspoons.

Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by dragonwriter on Friday June 26, 2020 @09:16AM (#23651596)
> Are kitchen scales accurate enough for such tiny measurements

Yes, and there are lots of recipes that use mass rather than volumetric measurements. For solids, in fact, many sources prefer this because consistency of packing density and other user factors that effect consistency with volumetric measure are far worse than with mass measured with a kitchen scale.

Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by barbegal on Friday June 26, 2020 @09:48AM (#23651925)
Yes below 5g it's not that accurate but I've never seen a recipe demand precision like 1.3tsp so if anything you can get more accuracy with weight.
Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by DavidVoid on Friday June 26, 2020 @06:19AM (#23650431)
Huh, here in Sweden we use volumetric measurement for most things (milk, flour, sugar, etc.), usually in milli- centi- or deciliter.

The exception is usually butter, which is measured in grams (and conveniently indicated on the packaging).

Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by gindely on Friday June 26, 2020 @09:49AM (#23651933)
Well, the conveniently indicated grams on the packet are not units of weight - they're units of volume. So you've got two kinds of units of volume in your recipes: milli/centi/decilitres, and grams of butter. But it's fairer than the grams of flour I've been ranting about elsewhere here because at least the manufacturer can have some responsibility for fine tuning it to their product!
Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by qtk8 on Friday June 26, 2020 @11:10AM (#23652845)
Do you have any source for your claim that "grams of butter", "grams of flour" and "grams of sugar" do not all refer to the SI unit "gram"?

I live in Europe and have always weighed exactly 100g on the scale, whether I was asked for 100 grams of butter, sugar or flour.

Re:Turn recipe websites into plain text by SAI_Peregrinus on Monday June 29, 2020 @09:57AM (#23677634)
They are the SI unit of mass. He's just saying that because it's indicated by lines on the package that the actual measurement is done in volume, and the conversion is implicit by the scaling. Where he goes wrong is in thinking that it's implying that "grams of butter" is a unit of volume.