Does this work? http://archive.is/Oj2qI
Again, I’m not disagreeing with the archive.is stance either. I do think their argument has merits; I just think this is a case of competing incentives for archive.is and Cloudflare. Archive.is likely has reason to not want their server or scraper IPs burned, or otherwise blocked by Cloudflare or associated sites or users, anymore than archive.is would want to be blocked by any domain; it’s counter to the purpose of the site, regardless of what site operators may want. By that same token, Cloudflare has a financial and business interest in doing what customers request of them, within their SLA and product matrix. I don’t find either party’s position surprising, but I don’t know where it goes from here, if anywhere.
DNS is an unwieldy holdover from a past era, but it’s what makes URLs work for many use cases. Tested, functional software is a good thing, but so are alternatives. This isn’t meant to be about DNS generally, just about archiving services, I guess, and how hard it is to find the good ones we have, as well as create new ones.
Maybe things like Web3Torrent[3] can bridge this gap?
[1] on HN (2019) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828317
[2] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/1-1-1-1-faster-internet/id1423...