Re:San Francisco Tenants Break Leases at Alarming Rates
by cameldrv on Thursday June 25, 2020 @09:29PM
(#23647828)
So it could be as few as 50/10377 = 0.5% of tenants broke their lease. This is a useless survey unless they asked the landlords how many of their tenants broke their lease.
Re:San Francisco Tenants Break Leases at Alarming Rates
by apta on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:11AM
(#23648895)
As typical of sensationalist media these days looking to get clicks.
Re:San Francisco Tenants Break Leases at Alarming Rates
by anoncareer0212 on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:30AM
(#23648978)
Unfortunately not every survey will meet the high standards of internet commenters looking for blood
Re:San Francisco Tenants Break Leases at Alarming Rates
by peanut_is_yum on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:49AM
(#23649088)
I understand why you might feel this way, but I don't think the parent and grandparent comments are necessarily "looking for blood." They bring up valid concerns.
Disclosure: I haven't read the linked article.
Re:San Francisco Tenants Break Leases at Alarming Rates
by mandelbrotwurst on Friday June 26, 2020 @10:27AM
(#23652314)
Whose blood are commenters looking for by pointing out that the data given in the piece fails to lend any credence to the "alarming rate" claim?
Re:San Francisco Tenants Break Leases at Alarming Rates
by jon_elbrook on Friday June 26, 2020 @04:05AM
(#23649785)
or any standard at all?
So, 50 landlords (~16% of 315) reported that they had at least one tenant unexpectedly leave early? Over what time period? How many tenants in total? This may or may not be an interesting story - we can't tell.