News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT by jsjohnst on Thursday June 25, 2020 @02:21PM (#23643790)
> I'm surprised there is no "right to privacy" spelled out in clear terms.

The problem is, there is no definition of the word “privacy” in the context of “right to privacy” that a majority can agree on. I highly doubt even the niche audience of HN could agree on what they feel is private or not. I think the EU took a decent shortcut around that debate with “right to be forgotten”.

Re:An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT by jsjohnst on Thursday June 25, 2020 @03:56PM (#23644865)
Case in point, there’s a heated debate on HN today in the comments section of the DoJ post on Wikileaks whether Steve Job’s medical history (as shared by Wikileaks) should be private or not.