Re:Julian Assange charged in superseding indictment
by dvfjsdhgfv on Thursday June 25, 2020 @01:01PM
(#23642807)
I somehow hope they were talking about light drugs. Given the amount of storm it caused, it's beyond me why there was no official examination, to say nothing about explanation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Julian Assange charged in superseding indictment
by newacct583 on Thursday June 25, 2020 @03:55PM
(#23644851)
Official examination of what? I mean, yeah, you're probably right. More likely than not they were talking about weed. Or plausibly sex workers. Something embarassing. Certainly not child trafficking in a literal pizza shop.
> Given the amount of storm it caused
It really didn't. Except for the lunatic who walked into the restaurant with a gun, almost none of this stuff penetrated mainstream media. FOX watchers got their fill, but they weren't swayable votes, by definition. To the eyeballs the Clinton campaign cared about, Pizzagate was a non-issue.
Lefties like me only like to talk about it because it was so crazy insane. This isn't what cost the election.