An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT

Re:An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT by monocasa on Thursday June 25, 2020 @10:06AM (#23640896)

Would you apply the same reasoning to any other country that used nukes to "end an existing war"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT by JumpCrisscross on Thursday June 25, 2020 @10:26AM (#23641121)

> Would you apply the same reasoning to any other country that used nukes to "end an existing war"?

Yes, using nukes defensively is less bad than using it to start a war. That doesn’t mean I support the use of nukes.

WWII was unique in starting with no nukes and ending with them. We also didn't yet understand the long-term ramifications of the weapon's use.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An even worse anti-encryption bill than EARN IT by monocasa on Thursday June 25, 2020 @02:25PM (#23643834)

So which conflicts since WWII would you OK the "defensive" use of nuclear weapons?

[ Parent | on HN ]