Re:Julian Assange charged in superseding indictment
by monocasa on Thursday June 25, 2020 @10:12AM
(#23640956)
A) The CNAIPIC leaks weren't by wikileaks
B) Why do we trust the CNAIPIC to tell the truth that they weren't their docs?
Re:Julian Assange charged in superseding indictment
by himinlomax on Thursday June 25, 2020 @10:51AM
(#23641406)
So I did a brief Google search and it seems that, just like monocasa mentioned, this was not published by Wikileaks.
Are you going to change your stance or are you going to stand by your incorrect, if not slanderous, claim?
Re:Julian Assange charged in superseding indictment
by jessaustin on Thursday June 25, 2020 @02:36PM
(#23643961)
This is why they invent new greenbean accounts; they can lie without "consequences".
>A few hours later, the assessment worsened: a friendly source from CNAIPIC was telling them that some of the documents had been forged. One document number, when checked against CNAIPIC’s system, reportedly corresponded to a wholly unrelated matter. The remaining real documents didn’t seem to have come from CNAIPIC either. Instead, police were apparently investigating “a small IT company that has worked for CNAIPIC in the past and that apparently some of the stolen data were on a machine they took to repair in Rome.” There was an immediate suspicion that it was “a giant op by the police to [discredit] anonymous and to tarnish our reputation and credibility.”