News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C performance mystery: delete unused string constant by api on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @10:09PM (#23636142)
Why isn't it the default everywhere?
Re:C performance mystery: delete unused string constant by jeffbee on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @10:18PM (#23636203)
As I tried to indicate, the microbenchmark-guided unrolled loops look better than the simple `rep` instruction because the benchmarks aren't realistic. They don't suffer from mispredicted branches, they don't experience icache pressure. Basically the microarchitectural reality is absent in a small benchmark.

There's also the fact that `rep` startup cost was higher in the past than it is now. I think it started to get really fast around Ivy Bridge.

This is all discussed in Intel's optimization manual, by the way.

Re:C performance mystery: delete unused string constant by xelxebar on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @11:05PM (#23636475)
Neat. I was unaware of this manual. For the lazy but curious:

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/downloa...

And if you want ALL THE THINGS:

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/article...