News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney... by gamblor956 on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @11:15AM (#23628804)
Context not required. A knife isn't a form of communication so mailing it to your lawyer doesn't make it privileged.

Also, his comment is not FUD. It reflects the original state of things. The attorney client privilege is an exception to the norm, that created the civil right you claim you wish to discuss.

Re:USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney... by caconym_ on Wednesday June 24, 2020 @11:29AM (#23629019)
> the civil right you claim you wish to discuss.

Since you've accused me of bad faith, I'll invite you now to go fuck yourself.

You're a fool if you think context doesn't matter. I asked the questions I did to invite that person to consider and clarify his position, which I didn't entirely disagree with. Context is how a conversation accumulates non-trivial meaning, and a lack of respect for it generates the sort of valueless crap I'm replying to right now.

This conversation, by the way—the one between you and me—is now over.