Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on USA v David Correia: Devices sent from client to attorney not privileged [pdf]. Parent comment
And they should; if it turns out, that it is actually protected information, then it couldn't serve as proof anyway.
Otherwise any and all evidenve would be "safe" the moment you give it to your attourney, which would make it rather easy to get away with anything.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
And they should; if it turns out, that it is actually protected information, then it couldn't serve as proof anyway.
Otherwise any and all evidenve would be "safe" the moment you give it to your attourney, which would make it rather easy to get away with anything.