News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Forking HTML into a static language doesn't make sense. Parent comment

Re:Forking HTML into a static language doesn't make sense by WorldMaker on Monday June 22, 2020 @04:25PM (#23606045)
Correct, the debate over XHTML 2.0 was exactly why the WHATWG was formed. It's indeed how the W3C lost most of its teeth in browser standards. XHTML 2.0 had some good ideas, but it shows how hard it is to govern standards from ivory towers.
[ Parent | on HN ]

There are no comments on this comment yet.