Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by untog on Monday June 22, 2020 @12:07AM (#23597273)

I think there’s a difference: I too enjoy conversation with people who think differently than myself and with whom I disagree. But a self described contrarian may well hold those opinions simply because they are contrary, not because it’s something they actually truly believe. That is rarely a satisfying conversation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by klyrs on Monday June 22, 2020 @12:56AM (#23597417)

Lifetime contrarian here. Contrarianness for its own sake is a child's game.

I tend to see multiple sides to things when others seem to agree that there's only one side to see. I'm the person who talks about the elephant in the room. In a professional context, that means putting my neck on the line; be bloody sure that I'm speaking up about something I believe, not just taking the piss.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by coldtea on Monday June 22, 2020 @01:53AM (#23597601)

Amen.

I like the role of "advocatus diaboli" (the devil's advocate).

Not for the mere sake of argument, but because I find elements of truth in all sides, and want to balance the sheepish behavior of most groups to fully side with one side.

To the group-mind this makes it appear like you are contrarian for the sake of it and contradictory, e.g. "but you where anti-colonialist in yesterday's argument, why are you pro-west today" or "you like Apple and MS, why do you say OSS is good now?" and so on...

But that's just judging each case both on its own merits and in general context and thinking for yourself - not just taking some given side...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by runawaybottle on Monday June 22, 2020 @04:44AM (#23598326)

I think there’s a tinge of misanthropy in those who are comfortable being contrarian. If most people believe something, it’s probably not that right, or at the very least, needs more vetting before blanket shallow acceptance. Contrarians must first diagnose that before all else.

It’s totally a valid criticism that contrarians are distasteful for that simple reason, but the herd can be equally annoying. It’s a symbiosis.

The Joker to Batman: You complete me

We’re also very pretentious as you can see :p

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by klyrs on Monday June 22, 2020 @03:06PM (#23604542)

I agree, Batman is an excellent example of a misanthropic, pretentious contrarian ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by runawaybottle on Tuesday June 23, 2020 @07:04PM (#23621505)

Not the hero you want, but the hero you deserve.

Best cheesy outro ever: https://youtu.be/6c_H45kt1_8

Greatest in group contrarian ever?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by seven4 on Monday June 22, 2020 @12:09AM (#23597282)

Thanks for clarifying. Exactly what i was getting at - my "default state" was based on the Contrarian sans context (i.e. for the sake of it). Think it's an interesting thought exercise.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by coldtea on Monday June 22, 2020 @01:47AM (#23597578)

Well, but the IGC is not contrarian without context.

It's an In Group Contrarian -- so contrarian in the context of the group.

This means that

(a) they are not just contrarian for the sake of it (then they would be contrarian to the ideas of every group, not just one)

(b) they are not opposed to everything the group believes (in that case they wouldn't be in-group contrarians, but mere ideological enemies of the group)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by seven4 on Monday June 22, 2020 @02:04AM (#23597637)

Agree - original comment was on the meta not the specific.

So where there is no specific group or context in which to place said "contrarian" - just a description of what was felt/instinctive. Would change immediately once we get into a specific example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Preliminary Theory of the In-Group Contrarian by GoblinSlayer on Monday June 22, 2020 @08:56AM (#23599619)

All groups you know don't have contrarian opinions? Most ideas can be questioned.

[ Parent | on HN ]